Thylacine Studios - Forum

Post about the spells you think should be changed here.  (Read 2108 times)

Offline SyneLau

  • *
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
Re: Post about the spells you think should be changed here.
Reply #10 December 03, 2017, 05:13:20 PM
I think the Spell system should use a revamp.  In Siralim 2, spells are front-loaded.  The incentive is to blow through your strongest spells and eliminate the enemy team as quickly as possible.  Because of this, low-cost and single target spells require too much of an opportunity cost for little benefit.  Here is what I propose:

  • All creatures start with 50% of their maximum mana.
  • Weak spells replenish mana instead of costing mana, in addition to their effects.
  • Strong spells spend your mana.

This will increase strategic depth on your spell selection and usage.  This can also add depth to Traits and other effects that are dependent on your mana percentage.

Offline anokatax

  • *
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Post about the spells you think should be changed here.
Reply #9 December 02, 2017, 01:46:22 PM
Not necessarily a spell, but related to spells - many spells' descriptions use words like "Splash" or "Burn"

I suggest making the Library/Glossary/Monster Info (for monsters we've captured already) viewable in battle so we can double-check during battles and not have to go into town/memorize it/google it. Its a minor Quality of Life improvement IMO.

Offline Psylisa

  • *****
  • Posts: 537
    • View Profile
Re: Post about the spells you think should be changed here.
Reply #8 December 01, 2017, 09:37:21 PM
Spells that have a detrimental effect to your own team should be removed or changed. Anger, for instance, is just useless. Double cast it, and the battle is over.

Offline virtua

  • **
  • Posts: 75
    • View Profile
Re: Post about the spells you think should be changed here.
Reply #7 November 29, 2017, 05:23:59 PM
 they also ignore Invisible, they also remove shell. ect, yes thats important part about AOE.

i think jamosup is right, the way AI is, aoe spells are just way more effective since ai doesnt know how to handle things. but if you ever fight wonder twins on god lvl 10 you will have some extreme difficulty surviving their steel wind aoe and killing both twins at the same time without cheesing them. its all based around AI.

Offline jamosup

  • ***
  • Posts: 205
    • View Profile
Re: Post about the spells you think should be changed here.
Reply #6 November 24, 2017, 09:58:35 PM
It's less of a change to the spells themselves rather than the situations you use them in, but situations that require more single-target damage in general would bring single target spells into more use. Possibly having smaller enemy packs than 6 with higher levels or minibosses of sorts (like the nemesis bosses from beating a large amount of one species); even against bosses, they generally had enough emphasis on their additional minions that you still wanted to attack everything at once, and bosses of course only appear occasionally. (or never again, in the normal realms past 40 in S2) Still, AoE spells having a heavy cost associated with them is a good plan.

As for other spell changes; Siralim 2 had a large amount of "trinket" spells that had awfully small effects (most spells that applied beneficial statuses to a single target, for example), and were "balanced" by low mana-costs. Even if you spend 0 mana, you still have to take a turn, though, and that's often a lot more important anyway. These spells could be a lot more useful if along with their low mana cost, you were allowed to use one of these "instant" spells and act again normally. (or use an instant spell again, which would then actually consume your turn) Again, this is for those really small effects, pretty much no damaging effect would need this treatment, except maybe one or two spells that have this property to be unique. Abilities that react to spellcasts could also ignore these if the extra casts per turn got out of hand.

Online Umaro

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1191
    • View Profile
Re: Post about the spells you think should be changed here.
Reply #5 November 24, 2017, 12:36:53 PM
That sounds great! Still, I think it wasn't just autocasts that made them ridiculous, I think their main advantage over single-target spells is simply the fact that you can damage all enemies at once, since there are so many ways to increase spell damage in the game. But it's not their only advantage: they also ignore Invisible, and since spells never miss like Attack does, they're obviously the best way to do damage in S2.

Also, there are ways to cast them without using Mana, and I'm sure casting an AoE spell 5 times with Multicast+rune, the "casts 1 additional time" property and the Double Take trait would still do the job :P (Actually Familiars can cast up to 6 times :O)

But... I'm not sure how to balance them without making them useless. I mean, you could add a buff that negates only AoE spells, but that would be overpowered in the player's hands.

Still, I wasn't really complaining about AoE spells, just wishing there was a use for the single-target ones :P
« Last Edit: November 24, 2017, 02:39:36 PM by Umaro »

Online Zack

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3401
    • View Profile
Re: Post about the spells you think should be changed here.
Reply #4 November 24, 2017, 11:14:06 AM
AoE won't be as powerful this time. They're now balanced around using them on 6 enemies, whereas they were balanced around using them on only 3 enemies before. And what made them really ridiculous were the auto-casting properties because those didn't cost any mana. You'll run out of mana if you have to cast them manually, and some creatures won't even be able to cast a few of the most powerful ones because they simply don't have enough mana.
Designer and Programmer of Siralim and The Negative. Follow us on: Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

Online Umaro

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1191
    • View Profile
Re: Post about the spells you think should be changed here.
Reply #3 November 24, 2017, 11:09:42 AM
My main issue with spells in S2 is that single-target damage spells feel useless when compared to AoE. There are exceptions like Homing Arrow, but who would use Fireball over Volcano (and Firestorm even more so)?

Online Umaro

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1191
    • View Profile
Re: Post about the spells you think should be changed here.
Reply #2 November 18, 2017, 08:08:59 PM
Equality is overpowered.

Online Zack

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3401
    • View Profile
Post about the spells you think should be changed here.
Reply #1 November 18, 2017, 03:55:50 PM
Whether you think a certain spell is underpowered, overpowered, or so boring/weird that it should be changed entirely, please post all about them here, along with any suggestions you have about how they could be improved.
Designer and Programmer of Siralim and The Negative. Follow us on: Facebook | Twitter | YouTube